In states that have their own apps, without the benefit of push notifications, the numbers are far lower: about 5 percent in New York, less than 3 percent in Alabama and about 1 percent in Wyoming. Virginia has had the most success, at nearly 10 percent, having devoted about $1.5 million to public awareness campaigns.
Jeff Stover, the executive adviser to the state’s health commissioner, said that public health departments have for months been encouraging testing and mask-wearing, and that marketing coronavirus exposure apps is also essential. Virginia has “done a good job of continually increasing the proportion of the population who is buying into this,” he said. “We have had to market to different segments of society that might have different reasons not to trust the government.”
A pilot study in California suggested that traditional advertising might not be the most effective way to get people to use the technology. “Far and away the most effective messaging was a text to your phone,” said Dr. Christopher Longhurst, chief information officer at the University of California San Diego Health. The best text message, he said, told people that the app could help them protect their family and friends.
From the beginning, one of the main concerns among the public has been privacy. After years of surveillance scandals, people are reasonably skeptical of technology companies and the government, said Elissa Redmiles, a computer scientist who has studied attitudes toward Covid apps.
“They have this sense that everyone is taking their data constantly, and they don’t want to give up any more data,” she said, or they worry about authoritarianism and think, “I don’t want to be surveilled by the government.”
The focus on privacy has led to something of a Catch-22. Dr. Redmiles’s research shows that people want assurances not only of privacy but also of the technology’s effectiveness before agreeing to use the apps in large numbers. But privacy protections make it harder to collect the very data that can show how well the apps work.
“If you can’t see whether it’s effective, it’s not very compelling,” said Marc Zissman, a computer security researcher at M.I.T.’s Lincoln Laboratory. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tapped Dr. Zissman’s lab this fall to help figure out how effective the exposure-notification system is.
Be the first to comment